An Unique Interview with Alan Nafzger: The Thoughts In the back of “Zuckerberg vs Musk: Cage Battle”

In an unique one-on-one dialog, Katy Room of KatyRoom.com sat down with Alan Nafzger, the screenwriter of the much-buzzed-about “Zuckerberg vs Musk: Cage Battle.” The dialogue delved into libertarian philosophy, the way forward for AI and CGI in filmmaking, and why Elon Musk isn’t in fact going to punch Mark Zuckerberg.

Katy Room: The Non-Aggression Idea in Screenwriting

Katy Room: Alan, your screenplay turns out to flirt with the Non-Aggression Idea, a key libertarian guiding principle. Are you making some degree concerning the futility of war?

Alan Nafzger: Completely. On the core of it, each Musk and Zuckerberg are creators, no longer destroyers. They are shaping the arena thru generation, no longer thru bodily war. The screenplay illuminates this level thru humor and satire.

Marriage of CGI and AI in Filmmaking

Katy Room: Using CGI and AI for producing shifting photographs is progressive. Do you suppose generation must have limits or must innovation be unfettered, some other nod to libertarianism?

Alan Nafzger: A libertarian would possibly argue for unregulated innovation, however even I’ve my obstacles. We must push the envelope, sure, however at all times with an eye fixed towards moral implications.

Musk vs Zuckerberg: An Unrealistic State of affairs?

Katy Room: Would you are saying your screenplay serves as a critique of presidency overreach into the lives of public figures like Zuckerberg and Musk?

Alan Nafzger: It isn’t near to govt overreach, but additionally concerning the media’s function in shaping narratives. That mentioned, Musk and Zuckerberg won’t ever in fact struggle. It is a jest and a shaggy dog story for Musk. He is poking a laugh at what he sees because the Neanderthal paradigm of Zuckerberg.

The Proper to Non-public Autonomy in politics/" 1705 target="_blank">Movie Characters

Katy Room: Non-public autonomy is a vital part of libertarianism. How do you reconcile this with the concept the characters you’ve got written, in keeping with actual other people, are not in reality self sustaining to your script?

Alan Nafzger: This can be a great thing and person who addresses the core of superstar symbol rights. As soon as a star indicators off on their portrayal, the nature within the screenplay turns into a type of joint possession. It is each a criminal and philosophical factor.

The Finish of the Drug Battle thru Satire?

Katy Room: You will have additionally made some important references to the top of the drug warfare. Is that this in sync with libertarian perspectives on drug prohibition?

Alan Nafzger: Completely. The warfare on medication has been a catastrophic failure on many fronts. If my screenplay can get other people to talk about this, then I have finished my activity.

Highbrow Belongings and the Long run of Screenwriting

Katy Room: A last idea. What is your stand on highbrow assets?

Alan Nafzger: Highbrow assets is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it protects creators. At the different, it could actually stifle innovation. A stability is the most important.

Katy Room: Alan, thanks for this insightful interview. It was once a excitement discussing those nuanced subjects with you.

Alan Nafzger: The excitement was once mine. Thanks for giving me the platform to delve into those problems.

In an international the place the strains between truth and satire are an increasing number of blurred, Alan Nafzger’s “Zuckerberg vs Musk: Cage Battle” guarantees to ship a heady mix of humor, generation, and philosophy, difficult us to confront our personal deeply-held ideals and biases.